CWP-2048-2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 233 CWP-2048-2021 Date of decision: 05.05.2025 Baldev Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Varinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the impugned order dated 23.12.2020 (Annexure P-7), passed by respondent No.3 whereby the claim of the petitioner for regularization has been illegally rejected on the ground that petitioner is not entitled for regularization of Govt. Policy dated 04.03.1999 (Annexure P-1) as well as Govt. Instruction dated 17.07.2002 (Annexure P-5). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was appointed as Part-Time Sweeper on 01.02.2007 in the office of respondent No.4. He further submits that no speaking order has been passed giving reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner for regularization. This case is squarely covered by the Judgment in the case of Surjit Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and others passed in CWP-1824 of 2014 against which LPA No.771 of 2015 was also filed by the State of Punjab which was dismissed on 29.04.2016. ANIL KUMAR 2025.05.06 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2048-2021 2 3. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, in instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide afresh, taking note of the aforesaid judgments, within a period of 6 months, uninfluenced by the order impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 05.05.2025 anil Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No ANIL KUMAR 2025.05.06 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document