2025:JHHC:14270 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2886 of 2025 ----- 1. Shekh Chunnu @ Zamir @ Shekh Jamir Hussain, son of Sheikh Ibrahim, R/o Kharkhari Basti, P.O.-Kharkhari, P.S.-Madhuban, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 2. Shekh Dacter @ Shekh Ibrar @ Ibrar Hussain, son of Shekh Ibrahim, R/o Kharkhari Basti, P.O.-Kharkhari, P.S.-Madhuban, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 3. Shekh Anjar @ Santu @ Shekh @ Shekh Tasauvar, son of Seikh Anwar, R/o R/o Kharkharee Basti, P.O.- Kharkharee, P.S.-Madhuban, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .......... Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. ----- Order No.02 Date: 29.05.2025 1. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)/191(3)/190/121(2)/132/ 127(1)/109(1)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It has been alleged that the petitioners along with 14 other named accused persons and 120-150 unknown persons pelted stones on the police party and threatened them with dire consequences while the police raided the 2025:JHHC:14270 2 house of co-accused Shekh Tohid @ Dablu. It has also been alleged that in the said occurrence five police officials got injured out of them one person sustained grievous injury. However, on perusal of the self-statement of S.I. of Madhuban P.S., it would be evident that no specific allegation of assault has been made against any of the petitioners. The petitioners are labourers and undertake to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, they may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned A.P.P. opposes the petitioners’ prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within three weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/