[2025:RJ-JP:18368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4828/2025 Sandeep Kansal @ Sandeep Agrawal S/o Jaibhagwan Kansal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Proprites M/s Delhi Marketing Head Office J/42, Nazafgarh Road, Nangloi, Delhi, At Present 112, Near Mannat Public School, Yadav Park Extension, Nangloi, Delhi At Present C- 79 Shiv Ram Park, Nangloi West Delhi, At Present 19/33 Ramnarayan Bazar Patka Pura, Kanpur Police Station Phoolbagh, U.p. At Present C-217, Lig World Bank Colony, Police Station Barra, District Kanpur Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat with Mr. Ravindra Singh Nirwan Mr. Hemant Runthla Ms. Karishma Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0240/2023 registered at Police Station-Bindayaka, District-Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As per FIR, it is evident [2025:RJ-JP:18368] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4828/2025] that there is commercial transactions between the parties, in which the so called case has been registered against the petitioner. The entire FIR is on the sole ground of non-payment of the amount, the case of civil nature has been turned into criminal nature. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 25.03.2025. Charge- sheet has been filed and there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sandeep Kansal @ Sandeep Agrawal S/o Jaibhagwan Kansal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/242