Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:37774
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 328 of 2020 Satish Kumar S/o Malki Siddique Aged About 69 Years R/o Hiralal Ward Daupara, Mungeli Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
... Appellant versus 1 - Sulankshana W/o Shyam Dinkar Aged About 71 Years R/o Hiralal Ward Daupara, Mungeli Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 2 - Sulochana (Died) Exparte Through Lrs. Nill 2.1 - A Rashmi Barik W/o Prakash Barik Aged About 53 Years Teacher R/o Tahsil Lundra P. O. Lamgaon District Surguja Chhattisgarh 2.2 - B Theodor Titus S/o Late Sulochana Aged About 62 Years Kabir Ward, Gambo Para, Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 2.3 - C Shobhana Masih Wd/o Rakesh Masih Aged About 56 Years R/o Masjid Para, P. O. Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Satyendra Kumar S/o Late Malki Siddique Aged About 68 Years R/o Hiralal Ward Daupara, Mungeli Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh... Plaintiff Before Below 4 - Chhattisgarh Government Through Collector Mungeli Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Appellant : None present For Respondent No.4/State : Ms. Mandvi Bharadwaj, Panel Lawyer
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order On Board 31.7.2025
1. None present for the appellant when the matter is called for hearing repeatedly. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.08.01 14:04:39 +0530
2
2. In this circumstance, this Court has left with no other option, except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Judge Bini