Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14729 (AP)

Maddigiri Prasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/3927/2025 · 2025-04-10

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010183382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3927/2025 Between: Maddigiri Prasad, The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3927/2025 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR the following: [3457] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3927/2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused submits that the petitioners are arraigned as an accused No.1 in Cr.No.38 of 2025 on the file of Tirupati West Police Station for the alleged offence under Sections 69, 351(1) r/w 3(5) of BNS, Section 3(1) (r), 3(1)(s) of SC, ST & POA Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and 2nd respondent were in love and had physical intimacy with consent. However, after the relationship between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent strained, the 2nd respondent filed a complaint. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 4. Perused the material available on record. 5. The FIR is dated 18.03.2025, the investigation is yet to be concluded. This court is of the considered opinion that this case does not warrant any interference at this stage. 3 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. 7. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated : 10.04.2025 KKV 4 260 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3927/2025 Dated : 10.04.2025 KKV