SATNAM ALIAS SATYANAM v. JUDGE SMALL CAUSES/CIVIL JUDGE,(SENIOR DIVISION)COURT NO. 10, RAE BARELI AND OTHERS
A227/2951/2022 · 2025-05-22
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147288 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147288 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:30640 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2951 of 2022 Petitioner :- Satnam Alias Satyanam Respondent :- Judge Small Causes/Civil Judge,(Senior Division)Court No. 10, Rae Bareli And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bireshwar Nath Counsel for Respondent :- Apoorv Pandey,Gyanendra Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even in the revised list. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 20.5.2022 and also earlier judgement dated 25.5.2018. Both the courts have recorded a finding that the recall application was not maintainable under
Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C.as the service was duly effected and the proviso to Section 17 was also not complied with. In view of the said finding of fact, no interference is called for. The writ petition lacks merits and is accordingly dismissed. This order is being passed in the presence of Shri Gyanendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent.
Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Shukla Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench