Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 147279 (MAD)

M.Abdul Rahim v. Jeyabharathi

CONT P(MD)/1779/2025 · 2025-07-29

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P(MD)No.1779 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Cont.P(MD)No.1779 of 2025 M.Abdul Rahim ... Petitioner Vs 1. Mrs.Jeyabharathi, The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. 2. Sanjay Gandhi, The Tahsildar, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the Contemnors/respondents 2 and 4 for the wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court made in W.P.(MD) No.11823 of 2025, dated 25.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Amaravel Pandiyan For Respondents : Mrs.S.Jeya Priya, Govt. Advocate. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.1779 of 2025 O R D E R When the Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that pursuant to the direction issued in the main Writ Petition, an order has been passed by the District Revenue Officer, Dindigul in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1548857/2023/Aa6, dated 25.07.2025. 2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order, it is for him to challenge the same in the manner known to law. 29.07.2025 vsm Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.1779 of 2025 To 1. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. 2. Sanjay Gandhi, The Tahsildar, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.1779 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. vsm Cont.P(MD)No.1779 of 2025 29.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis