AARIF HUSSAIN PARRAY v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3241/2025 · 2025-12-24
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14727 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14727 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 122 Suppl. Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 3241/2025 CM No. 8705/2025
Aarif Hussain Parray …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Saleem Parray, Advocate Vs. UT of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 24.12.2025
When the maintainability of the instant writ petition was called into question, Mr. M. Saleem Parray, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought leave of this Court to withdraw the instant petition. He further prayed for liberty to pursue the appropriate legal remedies available under the law.
Learned counsel further submitted that in case petitioner approach the competent authority via an appeal, a direction be issued for the expeditious disposal of the same.
In view of the submissions made, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. It is observed that in the event the petitioner invokes the alternative remedies available under law, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's case with reasonable dispatch and within the mandates of law.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 24.12.2025 Manzoor
Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 24.12.2025 17.23