IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8640 of 2025 Decided on: 26th May, 2025 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Paramjeet Singh …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .....Respondents ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Ravi Verma, Advocate. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice.   Mr.   Vishwas   Kaushal,   learned   vice counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner   is   serving   in   the   respondent­H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and has prayed for direction   to   the   respondents   to   grant   him   work   charge status/regularization   of   services   from   the   date   he completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Learned   counsel   for   the   parties   have   jointly submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in  The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent­Corporation was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected matters.   Learned   counsel   for   the   parties   also   submitted that   this   writ   petition   be   disposed   of   in   terms   of   the directions issued in the aforesaid decision. 4. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the   parties   and   taking   into   consideration   the   aforesaid judgment, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider the case of   the   petitioner   in   accordance   with   law   laid   down   in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law   within   six   weeks   from   today.   Copy   of   the   order   so passed, be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 3 Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 26, 2025 Judge rohit