KAMAL @ KAMAL AHAMAD AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/5386/2025 · 2025-06-23
Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36120-DB
Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5386 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kamal @ Kamal Ahamad And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Shrivastava,Mrityunjay Tiwari,Rohit Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of First Information Report dated 07.06.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 229 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 125, 109(2) of B.N.S., 2023, P.S. Bheera, District Lakhimpur Khiri.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no allegation against the petitioners in relation to the incident mentioned in the FIR and that no offence stands made out against them and, further, the petitioners have been falsely implicated.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer and submits that common allegations were levelled against various accused persons and cognizable offence has been made out.
5. Considering the material on record and the submissions made, we find that it is not a fit case for quashing the FIR. However, the petitioners are at liberty to either apply for anticipatory bail in accordance with law or take any other remedy under the law, as may be advised to them.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 23.6.2025 AKShukla/- (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Pankaj Bhatia, J) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench