IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8256 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.05.2025 Akshat Sood. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2-State. : Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of subsequent developments after the filing of the writ petition, the same has been rendered infructuous. The petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh petition in accordance with law after incorporating the subsequent developments. 2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 21st May, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)