IN TH 114 Daya Ram Shri T.L. Departmen CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding order dated of this Cou Haryana an direction by treating the same b 03 months the petition COCP-4838-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.4838 o Date of decision Ram Versus T.L. Satya Parkash, Additional Ch rtment Haryana, Chandigarh and o AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti eedings be initiated against the respon r dated 29.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) pass is Court in CWP-16508-2025 titled a ana and others”, vide which the petiti tion “…to respondent No.2 to conside ating the present writ petition as a e by passing a reasoned and speaki nths of the receipt of certified copy o titioner being found eligible for reim 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4838 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-13.01.2026 …..Petitioner nal Chief Secretary, Transport and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate for A.G., Haryana. petitioner submits that contempt respondent for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “Daya Ram vs. State of petition with disposed of with a sider the claim of the petitioner as a representation and decide eaking order within a period of py of this order. In the event of reimbursement of the medical VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bills, the n petitioner w submits th 29.5.2025 dated 26.9. authority, a rendered in Complianc Sujan Sing on behalf o that necess dated 26.9 survives in supplied to by learned disposed o January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-4838-2025 (O & M) the necessary financial benefits be ner within a further period of 02 mon At the very outset, learned its that the directions issued by th .2025 (Annexure P-1) have been com 26.9.2025 (Annexure R-1) has been rity, and therefore submits that the ered infructuous and the same may be Learned counsel for the resp pliance Reports dated 08.10.2025 fil n Singh, Director General, State Trans ehalf of respondents No.1 and 2 resp necessary compliance has been mad 26.9.2025 (Annexure R-1) by the r ves in the present petition. Copy of the order dated 26. lied to learned counsel for the petitione In view of the above noted fa arned counsel for the petitioner, the osed of as having been rendered infruc Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 13, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 s be released in favour of the months.” arned counsel for the petitioner by this Court vide order dated en complied with and an Order s been passed by the respondent- at the present petition has been ay be disposed of as such. e respondent-State refers to the 25 filed by way of affidavit of Transport, Haryana, Chandigarh 2 respectively and also submits n made, while passing an order the respondent; thus, no cause ed 26.9.2025 (Annexure R-1) is etitioner. oted facts and submissions made er, the present petition has been infructuous. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document