Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14718 (RAJ)

RAJESH MEENA, S/O SHRI PRABHUDAYAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2042/2025 · 2025-05-09

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19705] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2042/2025 Rajesh Meena, S/o Shri Prabhudayal Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Kali Pahari,police Station Sadar Dausa, District Dausa (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Headqurter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj). 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Dausa. 4. S.h.o. Police Station Sadar Dausa, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapat For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 09/05/2025 Present petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS for fair and impartial investigation in the FIR No. 96/2025 dated 03.03.2025 lodged at Police Station Sadar Dausa District Dausa. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has filed representation dated 24.03.2025 before the respondents but a deaf ear was given to the same. Heard. Issue notices. Learned PP accepts notices on behalf of respondent-State. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstance of the case, this Court, in light of the directions encapsulated in Sakiri [2025:RJ-JP:19705] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2042/2025] Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], directs that on 27.05.2025 at 11.00 AM, the petitioner shall mark his presence before respondent No. 3-Superintendent of Police who shall give audience to the petitioner and take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /140