Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 147170 (ALL)

NADEEM AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/5399/2025 · 2025-06-23

Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36115-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5399 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nadeem And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State-respondents and Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the informant, who has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of First Information Report dated 12.06.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 148 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 324(4), 109, 191(2) BNS, P.S. Dalmau, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is the other side who has caused multiple injuries on the petitioner no. 3. 4. During the course of arguments, a clear picture has been drawn before the Court to the effect that there are cross versions in relation to the same incident. 5. Accordingly, no case for quashing of first information report stands made out and, therefore, we decline to exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. In so far as the prayer for interim relief is concerned, the petitioners are always at liberty to apply for anticipatory bail before the appropriate court. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 23.6.2025 AKShukla/- (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Pankaj Bhatia, J) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench