Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 147169 (ALL)

SANDEEP SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/5379/2025 · 2025-06-26

Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36616-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5379 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sandeep Singh Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Home Deptt. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Chetan Kumar Tiwari AND Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4646 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sandeep Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. This Court vide order dated 23.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.5379 of 2025 had directed that the matter be placed alongwith Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.4646 of 2025. 2. Since both the petitions arise out of same incident, they are being decided simultaneously by this common order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Shri Chetan Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Present petitions seek issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing FIR No.0211 of 2025, dated 15.05.2025, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Police Commissionerate, Ayodhya. 5. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.4646 of 2025 was preferred by the petitioner in which benefit of Section 35(3) of BNS was also granted on 28.05.2023. Subsequently, it is stated that during investigation, the parties have compromised. A copy of the compromise deed is on record as Annexure - 3 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.5379 of 2025 and the original deed has been handed over to the Investigating Officer. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the said fact that the parties have settled their disputes. 7. Considering the offence alleged and the fact that both the parties agree that the matter has been compromised, FIR No.0211 of 2025 (supra) is quashed. 8. Present petitions stand allowed in above terms. Order Date :- 26.6.2025 nishant . (Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Pankaj Bhatia, J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench