SMT. RAM PATI v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR DISTT. AMETHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5983/2025 · 2025-06-25
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147165 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147165 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36366 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5983 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ram Pati Respondent :- District Collector Distt. Amethi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jaganniwas Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vinod Kumar Singh Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :
"(i). issue order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the recovery citation dated 02.05.2025 for an amount of Rs.206200/- issued by the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 in pursuance of the agriculture loan amount of Rs.80,000/- from the opposite party no. 3 as contained in Annexure 1 to the writ petition ; (ii). issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party nos.1 and 3 to consider the petitioner according loan waiver scheme as issued by the U.P. Government and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 01.12.2019 which is pending before them as Annexure 4 to this writ petition." During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer to the extent that the petitioner be granted liberty to make a fresh representation to the Respondent no.3 herein, for the redressal of his grievance and prays that the authority concerned be directed to dispose of the representation within a certain time frame. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- Respondent and Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Respondent-bank have no objection to the prayer made. Considering the request made by the counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, liberty is granted to the petitioner to make a fresh representation, ventilating all his grievances, along with a certified copy of this order to the Branch Manager, respondent no.3 herein, within a period of one week from today. In case such a representation is made, the Respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law within a maximum period of three weeks from the date the representation is made to him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally
disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.6.2025/Pks Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench