Raj Theatre, Vijayawada, Krishna District v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10368/2015 · 2025-04-03
Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14714 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14714 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010184372015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 10368 Between: Raj Theatre, Vijayawada, Krishna District and Others State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 10368 OF 2015 Raj Theatre, Vijayawada, Krishna District and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 10368 OF 2015
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 insisting the petitioners to pay the trade license fee and user charges from the petitioners theatres as illegal, null, void and arbitrary and pass such other orders....”
2. Heard Mr. K. Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents.
3. During hearing learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that this matter is squarely covered by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh Order dated 21.07.2015 in W.P.No.22056 of 2012 and batch and requested to pass similar
order in this writ petition also. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents conceded the same.
4. Considering the submissions of learned counsel, this Writ Petition is
disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.22056 of 2012 and batch, dated 21.07.2015. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the order in W.P.No.22056 of 2012 and batch, dated 21.07.2015 along with this order. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.04.2025 KK