Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14709 (JHR)

SANICHAR MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2968/2025 · 2025-06-03

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14387 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2968 of 2025 --------- 1. Sanichar Mahto, aged about 45 years, S/o-Late Jagdish Mahto. 2. Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav, aged about 22 years, S/o- Basudeo Yadav. 3. Binod Yadav @ Binod Prasad Yadav, aged about 44 years, S/o-Late Jagdish Mahto, all are R/o Village-Bishunpur P.O.-Gadi Bharkatta, P.S.- Birni, District-Giridih (Jharkhand). ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Md. Ayub Ansari, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-03.06.2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending their arrest in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 14/2025, registered for the offences under Sections 191(1) / 191(2) / 190 / 126 / 127(1) / 117 / 109 / 118 / 76 / 352 / 351(1) / 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that this is a matter of case and counter-case with regard to property dispute. He further submits that as per the medical report the injury is simple in nature. He further submits that they have got no criminal antecedent and they are ready to abide by all the terms and conditions as imposed by this Court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the injury is simple in nature and it is matter of case and counter-case; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge these petitioners on anticipatory bail. 2025:JHHC:14387 2 Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and the learned court below on their surrender shall release them on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 14/2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation/trial and if they will not cooperate with the investigation/trial, the State shall be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-