IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8641 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Karam Chand …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): While placing on record Pension Payment Order issued by the competent authority, Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel representing the respondent No.4, states that pension has been authorised in favour of the petitioner. 2. Having perused aforesaid Pension Payment Order, which is taken on record, this Court finds that office of Accountant General has authorised pension for a sum of ₹13600/- in favour of the petitioner. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 disposed of with the direction to respondents/State to release the pension to the petitioner with all benefits incidental thereof expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four weeks. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 25, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)