RAMDHANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/677/2025 · 2025-09-16
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147030 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147030 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 677 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Sukh Deo Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.66 of 2025, under Sections 109, 191(2), 115(2), 125, 352, 351(3) B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Motigarpur, District- Sultanpur.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the application and he restricted his prayer for giving him an opportunity to file an application for bail.
4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 16, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ramdhani .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench