Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14701 (GAU)

M/S SHIMMER ENTERPRISE v. THE CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/3641/2023 · 2025-02-09

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010134982023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3641/2023 M/S SHIMMER ENTERPRISE (REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI BIRENDRA KUMAR BERIA), DR. B. BARUAH ROAD, ULUBARI, GHY- 781007 VERSUS THE CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND 4 ORS TO BE REP. BY THE DIRECTOR, KOKRAJHAR, BTR, ASSAM- 783370 2:THE REGISTRAR CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM- 783370 3:THE CHIEF PROJECT ENGINEER CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM- 783370 4:THE JUNIOR ENGINEER (CIVIL) CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM- 783370 5:UNION OF INDIA TO BE REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT NEW DELH Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U DAS, MS. R NEWAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 10.02.2025 Heard Mr. U. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned Dy. Solicitor General of India for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the balance amount of Rs. 2,35,618/- (Rupees Two Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Six Hundred Eighteen Only) has been received by the petitioner. Therefore, he has instructions from the petitioner not to press the writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as not pressed. Interim order if any stands vacated. Pending I.As are also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant