CHANDAVARAPU RATNA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/34940/2025 · 2026-04-16
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1470 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1470 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010675212025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 34940/2025 Between:
1. CHANDAVARAPU RATNA KUMARI, W/O. RAVI, OCC ADVOCATE, AGED ABOUT 43, D.NO.83-9-1455, KRISHNA BABU COLONY, OPP. VINAYAKA TEMPLE, VIP ROAD, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LALAPETA POLICE STATION, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI TOWN POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SIKHA JYOTHSNA, W/O. GOVATHOTI JAYAPAUL, D/O. SIKHA PRABHAKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42, OCC WOMEN POLICE CONSTABLE (6839), PRESENT WORKING AT MANGALAGIRI TOWN P.S, GUNTUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT REVENDRAPADU VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT AND NOW AT
2
BAVOJI NAGAR, 6TH LANE, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents, more particularly the 3rd respondent.
Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, in considering and acting upon the petitioners representation dated 03.10.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, more particularly the 3rd respondent, to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 03.10.2025 forthwith, by conducting a fair, impartial, and time-bound enquiry into the allegations of misuse of uniform, abuse of departmental influence, and false implication of the petitioner and her husband in criminal cases by the 6th respondent and to take appropriate disciplinary and legal action in accordance with law and Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent i.e Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 03.10.2025, by conducting a fair and impartial enquiry in accordance with law pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents, more particularly the 3rd respondent. Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, in considering and acting upon the petitioners representation dated 03.10.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, more particularly the 3rd respondent, to consider and dispose of
3
the petitioners representation dated 03.10.2025 forthwith, by conducting a fair, impartial, and time-bound enquiry into the allegations of misuse of uniform, abuse of departmental influence, and false implication of the petitioner and her husband in criminal cases by the 6th respondent and to take appropriate disciplinary and legal action in accordance with law and Pass ….”
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. V R Maheswara Rao Paleti, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that respondent No.3 has failed to register an FIR pursuant to the representation dated 03.10.2025 submitted by the Petitioner. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the representation of the Petitioner was registered as Crime No.482 of 2025 under Sections 79, 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the B.N.S’) at Nagarampalem Police Station, against one Shikha Jyothsna. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing Respondent No.3 to give logical conclusion to the FIR in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date:17.04.2026 SSA
4
30 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 34940 of 2025
Date: 17.04.2026 SSA