Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14699 (JHR)

MD GURFAN ALLIAS MD GUFRAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2842/2025 · 2025-07-11

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:18968 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2842 of 2025 ------ Md. Gurfan @ Md. Gufran, S/O late Md. Taslim, R/O Village – Rasid Nagar, PO – Chatra, PS + District – Chatra, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate : Ms. Aayushi Aman, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Abhishek Gautam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, APP ----- 05/ 11th July 2025 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of under Section 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, as the petitioner has been allegedly implicated in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 118, 109, 303 (2), 352, 351 (2), 3 (5), pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. 3. According to the prosecution allegation against the petitioner and others is that they have assaulted the informant and have committed crime by snatching gold chain. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and commission of snatching gold chain also is not attracted against the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that injury report clearly suggests that serious injuries have been caused by sharp-cut weapon as there is allegation of using knife. ( 2025:JHHC:18968 ) 2 6. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, I direct the petitioner to appear before the concerned Court to pray for grant of regular bail. If the petitioner appears, his case will be considered by the Court concerned taking into consideration individual overt act of this petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application of this petitioner is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Aditi