APHC010183522014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 36027 Between: Jamiat-ul-quresh Association, The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 36027 OF 2014 quresh Association, AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME (AP) MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 36027 OF 2014 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the respondents 2 and 3 in interfering with the business activity of slaughtering of the members of the petitioner society in S.No.392/1 of Katiki veedhi, Contonment limits, Vizianagaram, without any manner of right or any notice as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with the business activity of slaughtering of the members of the petitioner society till the completion of license period in S.No.392/1 of Katiki veedhi Contonment limits, Vizianagaram and pass such other orders....” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of passage of time, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 04.04.2025 KK