Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1469 (UTT)

ARVIND RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/78/2025 · 2025-01-22

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:637 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 22.01.2025 ABA No.78 of 2025 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Present Mr. Prem Kaushal, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State. 3. Applicants – Arvind Rawat, Ashok Rawat and Bhanu Pratap Singh Rawat are seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No.05 of 2025, under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Mussoorie, Dehradun. 4. Learned State counsel vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application and would argue that an equally efficacious remedy is available to the applicants/accused to file the anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court but without exhausting the same, the applicants/accused have straightaway approached this Court. 5. To this, learned counsel for the applicants/accused seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to take appropriate legal remedy from the appropriate Sessions Court. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicants/accused to approach the court of sessions seeking anticipatory bail. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) Vacation Judge 22.01.2025 SS SUKHBANT SINGH Digitally signed by SUKHBANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=71978f9c61bfde0ba69967c787b1764ea7bc7dd129a8a6380d49b1885e628615, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2D8B71B8D8E345F6B7F95B1DD4FB4BEBD2B7D72C42261361AED33172F152148 D, cn=SUKHBANT SINGH Date: 2025.01.22 16:28:27 +05'30'