AMIT MISHRA v. SESSIONS JUDGE DISTRICT SULTANPUR and ANR.
/6665/2017 · 2025-01-27
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146872 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146872 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5221
Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6665 of 2017 Applicant :- Amit Mishra Opposite Party :- Sessions Judge District Sultanpur And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Smt. Poonam Singh,Shashank Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Paritosh Shukla,Puttu Lal Mishra,Sukh Deo Singh Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Case called out.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application. However, learned AGA/complainant is present.
3. The matter pertains to the year 2017 and since then it is pending.
4. Application is accordingly rejected for non prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. However, it will be open for the applicant(s) to move recall application within eight weeks in case the cause of action still survives.
6. Office is directed to communicate this order to the court concerned forthwith for necessary action. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench