AZAIB SINGH ALIAS AZAIV SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, DEHRADUN
WPMS/3239/2025 · 2025-11-21
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14684 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14684 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10431
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3239 of 2025
Azaib Singh @ Azaiv Singh
......Petitioner Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others
...Respondents
Presence: Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, learned
counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Addl. C.S.C. assisted by Mr. Sudhir Nainwal,
learned Standing Counsel, for the State/respondent no.1. Mrs. Anjali Bhargawa, learned counsel for Gram Sabha/respondent no.8. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner directing the learned Court below/Presiding Judge to expeditiously decide Revenue Case No.22/08 of 2022, Azaib Singh vs. Sinder Singh & Others” filed by the petitioner under Section 176 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act pending before the court of Assistant Collector 1st Category, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Further prayer has been made directing the learned court below/Presiding Judge to hear the pending matter on day to day basis. 2. The present matter relates to the partition of land. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter relates back to 2022 and yet the proceedings are under trial and the matter is lingered on, on one pretext and the other. 1 Writ Petition No.3239 of 2025,Azaib Singh @ Azaiv Singh Vs State and others. -
Ashish Naithani J.
1
2025:UHC:10431
3. On perusal of the order sheet it reveals that on most of the occasions there was Bar Resolution passed by the Advocates and on some dates private respondents sought time for filing objection. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner prayed that direction be issued to the learned court below to expedite the proceedings of Revenue Case No.22/08 of 2022, Azaib Singh vs. Sinder Singh & Others. 5. I have considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the order sheet. By considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that trial should be expedited. The instant writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Assistant Collector 1st Category, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar to expeditiously decide Revenue Case No.22/08 of 2022, Azaib Singh vs. Sinder Singh & Others” expeditiously. It is provided that the court concerned shall not grant unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Ashish Naithani, J.
21.11.2025
Arti
2 Writ Petition No.3239 of 2025,Azaib Singh @ Azaiv Singh Vs State and others.
-
Ashish Naithani J.
2 ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.11.27 10:50:03 +05'30'