Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35635 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 670 of 2025 Applicant :- Chandra Sen Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard Shri Anurag Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Piyush Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail as the accused-applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0035 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(3), 103 B.N.S, Police Station Sairpur, District Lucknow North. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case as he was forced to go at the place of the incident by one Ravi and he has no concern with the alleged incident and he is ready to co-operate in the investigation, therefore, he is entitled for anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A.G.A has vehemently opposed the prayer of the applicant and has submitted that the complainant was living adjoining to the building in which certain students were residing and they were making noise in the night, as a result of which some objection was raised, then the wife of the complainant was killed. 5. He further submitted that the investigation of crime in question is going on. In Parcha-18, the statement of one Shreyansh was recorded and the CCTV footage was shown to him in which he identified the applicant, therefore, custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary. In such circumstances, for such a heinous offence, applicant is not entitled for bail. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record, contents of the F.I.R., other relevant documents including the case diary placed by learned A.G.A, this court is of the view that the alleged offence is of the killing of a lady with the fire arm merely on the ground that she raised objections on the noise which was being created by the accused persons, accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is hereby rejected. Order Date :- 16.6.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench