Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19182 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4017 of 2025 Applicant :- Uday Veer Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Shukla,Ajay Prakash Paul Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri P.K. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party. 2. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 309 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 427, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Quarsi, District Aligarh during the pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant and other co-tenure holders were duly recorded in the revenue records. The sale-deed was executed by one co-accused Sabir Rahi. No civil suit has been filed for cancellation of the sale- deeds executed by Sabir Rahi. The case is purely civil in nature. Further, identically placed co-accused Bani Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 04.02.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 793 of 2025, Bani Singh v. State of U.P. and another. The applicant is in jail since 12.12.2024 having no criminal history and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the record, this Court prima facie finds that the case is purely civil in nature. Identically placed co-accused Bani Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Moreover, the applicant has remained confined for almost two months and after submission of the charge-sheet there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, and no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant- Uday Veer Singh, involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned subject to the conditions that he: (i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; and, (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 10.2.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad