KALAIVANI v. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY, INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CRL OP/1291/2025 · 2025-01-17
G R Swaminathan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14677 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14677 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.1291 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.01.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P. No.1291 of 2025 Kalaivani ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by its The Inspector of Police, M.5 Ennore Police Station, Chennai – 600 057. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vinoth For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate [Criminal Side] O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 126[2], 296[b], 118[2] of BNS 2023, in Crime No.12 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1291 of 2025
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused is alleged to have abused and assaulted the son of the defacto complainant and caused injury. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is not involved in any previous case. 5. Considering the submissions of both sides and also of the fact that the victim has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1291 of 2025 from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottriyur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate / Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]. Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1291 of 2025 [e] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of the B.N.S. 17.01.2025 vrc To,
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottriyur
2. The Inspector of Police, M.5 Ennore Police Station, Chennai – 57. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1291 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. vrc Crl.O.P. No.1291 of 2025 17.01.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis