- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1906 RFA No. 164 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 164 OF 2014 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. D HARI S/O LATE SIDDAMMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.1212, 27, 5TH CROSS, JNANAJYOTHI NAGARA, BANGALORE-560 056. 2. D. RAMALINGA S/O LATE SIDDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 3. D. DURGADEVI D/O LATE SIDDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 4. D.MANGAMMA D/O LATE SIDDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.92, 3RD MAIN ROAD, JABBAR BLOCK, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE-560 003. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GANGADHARAIAH., ADVOCATE AND SRI. N RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR DORASWAMY S/O MUNISWAMY GOWDER, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1906 RFA No. 164 of 2014 NO.29, OLD NO.39/1, 2ND CROSS, MUNEESWARA BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE. 2. MR.ARJUNAN S/O SEDI GOUNDER AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 3. SMT.DHANAMMA W/O MR.ARJUNAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2 AND 3 WERE RESIDENT IN THE HOUSE OF KARI GOUNDER, MUNESHWAR BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE. (RESPONDENT NO. 2 & 3 ARE DEAD THE CASE AGAINST THEM IS ABETTED) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S VIVEKANANDA., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 & R3 ARE DELETED V/O DT. 22.08.2014) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96, R/W O-41, RULE-1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.09.2013 PASSED IN O.S.11024/1985 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION, RECOVERY OF POSSESSION AND MESNE PROFITS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1906 RFA No. 164 of 2014 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. None appears for the appellants. Even on last occasions, when the matter was called out, none appeared for the appellants. 2. Inspite of granting sufficient time, the appellants have failed to amend the causetitle and have not paid the cost of Rs.5,000/- imposed by this Court and even paper book has not been filed. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16