Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
930-CA-12448-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12448 OF 2024 IN FCAST/11966/2020 Manoj Surajmal Karva ….Applicant VERSUS Monika Manoj Karva …..Respondent ….. Mr. Darak Umesh P, Advocate for Applicant Ms. Vaishali S. Swami h/f Mr. M. C. Swami, Advocate for Respondent …..
CORAM :
R. G. AVACHAT & NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATE : 23.01.2025 PER COURT :
1. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that, for non- removal of offce objection, the First Appeal, which was on stamp number, came to be dismissed for default. He submits that, suffcient reasons are shown in the Application for not preferrini this Application within limitation. He submits that, the matter pertains to the matrimonial dispute and the Application be allowed.
2. Learned Advocate Ms. Swami appearini for Sole Respondent vehemently opposed the Application. She submits that, no suffcient reasons are shown for delayed Application. She submits that, the conduct of Applicant in not removini the offce objection shows that, he was not interested in pursuini the matter. The Application is devoid of any merits and the same be dismissed. 1 2025:BHC-AUG:2021-DB
930-CA-12448-2024.odt
3. After hearini both the sides, we have ione throuih the Application for condonation of delay. The Appeal arises of Family Court matter.
4. For the reasons stated in the Application, we allow the Application in terms of prayer clauses – [B] and [C] and the same is
disposed of accordinily.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] Sameer/Jan-2025 2 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 24/01/2025 18:12:07