Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146709 (ALL)

GEETA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. ITS THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/6041/2025 · 2025-06-25

Alok Mathur, Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36424-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6041 of 2025 Petitioner :- Geeta Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Its Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, 1. Vakalatnama, filed by Sri Mahesh Kr. Yadav, learned counsel for respondent No.3, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents as well as Anil Kr. Srivastava, learned counsel on behalf of respondent No.3. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court, claiming that the District Level Committee has allowed his claim under the U.P. Mukhyamantri Sarvhit Kisan Bima Yozna, however, respondent No.3 is not paying the same. 4. In this regard, the respondent No.3 has relied upon the judgement of this Court passed in Writ-C No. 5548 of 2024 (Mohd. Ikrar vs. State of U.P. and others) wherein, after considering the rival contentions of the parties, this Court was of the considered view that since the District Level Committee had already allowed the claim of the petitioner under the said scheme, the opposite party no.3 was bound to pay and would pay the same within a period of four weeks. 5. We find that the petitioner is entitled to the same relief which was granted in Writ-C No. 5548 of 2024. 6. Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.6.2025 Vandana (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench