Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14670 (RAJ)

RINKU @ PINTU S/O GOPIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4825/2025 · 2025-05-15

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20454] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4825/2025 Rinku @ Pintu S/o Gopiram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ladpura, Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6286/2025 Ravi Verma S/o Lallu Prasad, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Devli, Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Goutam Mr. Nirmal Kumar Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 15/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0105/2025 registered at Police Station-Lalsot, District-Dausa for the offences under Sections 3(5), 127(2), 140(3), 140(2), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned [2025:RJ-JP:20454] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4825/2025] Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that no recovery of material articles except motorcycle has been recovered from the petitioner-Rinku @ Pintu. The petitioner-Rinku @ Pintu is behind the Bar since 07.03.2025 and the petitioner- Ravi Verma is behind the Bar since 20.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Rinku @ Pintu S/o Gopiram (2) Ravi Verma S/o Lallu Prasad shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. ( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/158-159