Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1467 (CHH)

Sharda Prasad v. Smt.urmila Yadav And Ors.

FA/27/2014 · 2025-08-04

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:38802 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 27 of 2014 1 - Sharda Prasad S/o Bhaiyyaram Yadav Aged About 59 Years R/o Tata Line, Kohka, Ward No. 8, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai, Tah. And Distt. Durg C.G., Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Smt.Urmila Yadav W/o Late Bhaiyyaram Yadav Aged About 75 Years R/o Chhangulal Panthela, Bus Stand, Arjunda, P.S. Arjunda, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Khileshwari Yadav W/o Chhangulal Yadav Aged About 35 Years R/o Chhangulal Panthela, Bus Stand, Arjunda, P.S. Arjunda, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Hempushpa Yadav D/o Vishwanath Yadav Aged About 30 Years R/o Murmunda, Post- Godhi, Up-Tah. Ahiwara, P.S. Ahiwara, Distt. Durg C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Suresh Yadav S/o Vishwanath Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Murmunda, Post- Godhi, Up-Tah. Ahiwara, P.S. Ahiwara, Distt. Durg C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Subhash Yadav S/o Vishwanath Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o Murmunda, Post- Godhi, Up-Tah. Ahiwara, P.S. Ahiwara, Distt. Durg C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shashi Bai Yadav W/o Roopram Yadav Aged About 45 Years D/o Bhaiyyaram Yadav, R/o Akaltara, Post And P.S. Chhura, Tah. Gariyaband, Distt. Gariyaband C.G., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 7 - Anita Sahu W/o Dr. Narayan Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Maahud Bi, Tah. And P.S. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.08.06 11:01:03 +0530 8 - The State Of Chhattisgarh W/o Thru- The Collector, Distt. Durg C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Appellant : None For State : Mr. K.L. Sahu, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 05.08.2025 1. It has been reported that the sole appellant has expired and the legal representatives have not been brought on record. 2. Accordingly, the First Appeal is dismissed as abated against the appellant. However, liberty is granted to the legal representatives of the appellant to revive the same, if they intend to continue with the proceeding. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Deshmukh