Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75138 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 3629 of 2025 Applicant :- Dharm Raj Pal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sarthak Singh,Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shivendra Singh Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Heard Sri Sarthak Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shivendra Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.5856 of 2015 (Narendra Kumar Tripathi Vs. Dharmraj and Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 606 of 2014, under Sections 406, 392, 506 IPC, P.S. Pawara District Kaushambi, pending in the court of C.J.M., Kaushambi, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant of the case does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. It was submitted that on the basis of compromise between the parties, the proceedings of aforesaid case against co-accused, namely, Abhay Shukla have already been quashed vide order dated 20.03.2024 passed in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No.16271 of 2024. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Sri Shivendra Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 /complainant has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the complainant does not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. The complainant does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. There is nothing to indicate that parties have any criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the complainant has made categorical statement that the impugned proceedings may be quashed. In respect of co-accused, Abhay Shukla the proceedings of aforesaid case have already been quashed by this Court. 8. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 9. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings of the aforesaid case qua the applicant, namely, Dharam Raj Pal are hereby quashed. 10. Accordingly, the application 528 BNSS Cr.P.C. is allowed. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 I.A.Siddiqui Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad