SHUBHAM ALIAS SUDHA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/3381/2025 · 2025-04-25
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14666 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14666 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-3381-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 297 CRM-M-3381-2025(O&M) Date of Decision: 25.04.2025 SHUBHAM ALIAS SUDHA ....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Sunil Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Harmeet Kaur Bhatia, Advocate for Ms. Shweta, Advocate for respondent no.2 MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.0188 dated 18.05.2023 under Sections 328, 379 of IPC registered at Police Station Madhuban, District Karnal and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 04.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Deepak Patwal 2025.04.28 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-3381-2025(O&M) 2
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 07.04.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.0188 dated 18.05.2023 under Sections 328, 379 of IPC registered at Police Station Madhuban, District Karnal and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner.
( MANISHA BATRA ) 25.04.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.04.28 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document