Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146650 (ALL)

SMT. NEELAM v. SHRI NIKHIL TIKARAM FUNDE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AYODHYA AND 3 OTHERS

CAPL/1932/2025 · 2025-07-03

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37420 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1932 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Neelam Opposite Party :- Shri Nikhil Tikaram Funde District Magistrate Ayodhya And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Lakshmi Kant Tripathi,Shyam Mohan Pradhan Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present application has been filed with the prayer to summon and punish the opposite parties for the wilful and deliberate defiance of order dated 09.04.2025 passed by this Court in Writ A No.3831 of 2025 (Smt. Neelam Vs. State of UP and Ors.). 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that order dated 27.03.2025 was challenged before the Writ Court in Writ A No.3831 of 2025, in which, interim order was passed on 09.04.2025 with the direction that the post in question shall not be filled without the leave of Court but on the website, the name of opposite party no.4 is shown at serial no.6, therefore, opposite party nos.1, 2 and 3 have violated the direction of Writ court. In such circumstances, they should be summoned and punished accordingly. 4. Considering the submission of counsel for the applicant, order of Writ Court as well as contents of the present application, it is evident that the interim order was passed by the Writ Court on 09.04.2025 but the list which is annexed with the application at page-28 is for the period of January, February and March, 2025, therefore, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties. 5. Accordingly, the present contempt application is hereby dismissed. 6. Consigned to record. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench