Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14664 (RAJ)

CYFUTURE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CW/5684/2025 · 2025-05-20

Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21141-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5684/2025 Cyfuture India Private Limited, Having Its Registered Office At G1-227,228 And H1 236-239 Export Promotion,industrial Park Sitapura Jaipur 302002, Rajasthan Through Its Authorized Representative Shri Irshad Mohammed S/o Shri Gulam Mohammed, Aged 44 Years, R/o D-78, Prem Colony, Nehru Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur, 302016. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1, Jaipur, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302005. 2. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Centralized Processing Centre), Prestige Alpha, Post Box No.2, Electronic City Post, Bengaluru-560500 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Gargeiya with Mr. Hemang Gargieya Mr. Tarak Ahuja & Mr. Tanuj Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi with Mr. N.S. Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 20/05/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that after filing of the petition, refund has been granted. However, counsel [2025:RJ-JP:21141-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-5684/2025] for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the department for claiming the interest on delayed refund. 2. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty as prayed for. 3. There is no doubt in eventuality of the petitioner making a request for claiming interest, the same shall be dealt with by the respondent in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible in the facts of the case. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /22