APHC010182832019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7864/2019 Between: 1. SMT. TADIKONDA RAMADEVI,, W/O LATE SRINIVASA MADAN KISHORE, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 13-3-19, GUNTURUVARI THOTA, KOTHAPETA, GUNTUR DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR 4. THE PROTECTION OFFICER, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORTING CELL, GUNTUR. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTHAPETA POLICE STATION GUNTUR 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAPETA POLICE STATION, GUNTUR 2 7. TADIKONDA AJAY PRAKASH, S/O LATE SRINIVASA MADAN KISHORE, AGED 35 YEARS, EMPLOYEE IN USA, TEMPORARILY RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 13-3-19, GUNTURUVARI THOTA, KOTHAPETA, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not taking action to protect the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the 4th respondent to act according to the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4th respondent to take action on the petitioner application dated 06-06-2019 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7864 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Jithendra Kalyan, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 11.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7864 of 2019 Date: 11.08.2025 PSA