Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14661 (CHH)

HARISH KUMAR KAWRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1956/2024 · 2025-01-07

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:904 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1956 of 2024 1. Harish Kumar Kawre S/o Late Shri K. Potti Kawre, Aged About 38 Years R/o Qtr. No. H-29, GAD Colony, Avarabhatha, Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Animal Husbandry Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Cg) 2. Director, Directorate Of Veterinary Sevices, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector, South Bastar, Dantewada, District South Bastar (C.G.) 4. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, South Bastar, Dantewada, District South Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri R.S. Baghel, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri R.K. Gupta, Addl. Adv. General Order on Board By Bibhu Datta Guru, J. 7/1/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondents to release the outstanding dues in respect of work done by him as per Annexure – P/5. 2. Pleadings are complete in the matter. From the pleadings of both the parties, it is evident that disputed facts are involved with regard to 2 allotment of work and work done by the petitioner. The same cannot be ascertained by this Court in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the concerned Superintending Engineer, Department of Public Works, though he is not a party in this petition, is directed to look into the matter and ascertain as to whether the work allotted to the petitioner or not and whether the work in question has been done by the petitioner or not. The entire exercise be done after affording due opportunity of hearing to both the parties and by conducting spot inspection. On completion of the enquiry, submit a detailed report before the respondent No.1/Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Animal Husbandry Development Department. Thereafter, on the basis of the said report submitted by the Superintending Engineer, Department of Public Works, the respondent No.1 shall take necessary steps. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Digitally signed by K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Date: 2025.01.07 17:37:36 +0530