FATIMA AND OTHERS v. RAYEES ABDULLAH (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/53/2025 · 2026-09-01
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1466 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1466 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 27 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) No. 53/2025 Fatima and Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Khan, Adv. Vs. Rayees Abdullah ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms Raheela Khan, AC vice Mr. Ab. Rashid Malik. Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 01.09.2026
01. In terms of Order dated 27th June, 2024, which is the subject matter of the present contempt petition, the Writ Court
directed the writ petition be treated as representation and respondents were further directed to decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date copy of order along with writ petition and enclosed annexure were to be made available to them.
02. Compliance report stands filed along with Order dated 10th August, 2026.
03. In view of the above, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed, leaving the petitioner free to available appropriate remedy under law.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 01.09.2026
“Shamim Dar”