Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146571 (ALL)

ASIF NASEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/5275/2025 · 2025-06-18

Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35743-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5275 of 2025 Petitioner :- Asif Naseem Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suhail Iqbal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Rohit Tripathi Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Harsh Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pawan Kumar Mishra learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Akarsh Asthana holding brief of Sri Rohit Tripathi learned counsel for Directorate of Enforcement. 2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the F.I.R. registered as case crime no. 83 of 2020 under Sections 409 and 402 I.P.C., police station Gomti Nagar, district Lucknow. 3. Learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection that the investigation in furtherance of the F.I.R. already stands concluded and a charge-sheet has been submitted on 31.12.2021. 4. The petitioner has remedy of seeking quashing of the charge-sheet by filing a petion under Section 482 Cr.P.C. but the petitioner has not done so. 5. Confronted with the objection, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press this writ petition and he seeks liberty to file the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the liberty as aforesaid. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 18.6.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench