RAM LAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
ABAIL/669/2025 · 2025-09-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 669 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Heard Sri Hari Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the instant application and he states that the applicants will appear before the trial Court and seek their release on bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of by observing that in case the applicants appear before the trial Court and seek their release on bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law keeping in view the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others : (2021) 10 SCC
773. September 15, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Prasad, Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ram Lal And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench