Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14651 (KAR)

SMT. MAMATHA N D v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WPHC/8/2025 · 2025-01-23

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2816-DB WPHC No. 8 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION HABEAS CORPUS NO. 8 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. MAMATHA N D W/O MAHESH H R AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O NEAR LAKKAMMA TEMPLE, WARD No.19, SUBHASH NAGARA, KADUR, PO KADUR CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577548 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH RAJ URS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADUR POLICE STATION, KADUR CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577548 Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2816-DB WPHC No. 8 of 2025 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHIKKAMAGALURU CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577101 DETENUE: MISS AMRUTHA H M D/O H R MAHESH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/O NEAR LAKKAMMA TEMPLE, WARD NO.19 SUBHASH NAGARA, KADUR, PO KADUR CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577548 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP-I WITH SRI.M.V.ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP) THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYS TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3 TO FIND OUT THE WHEREABOUTS OF THE DAUGHTER OF THE PETITIONER MISS. AMRUTHA H.M., BE DIRECTED TO PRODUCE HER BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT FORTHWITH AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2816-DB WPHC No. 8 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo of withdrawal, seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Memo is accepted. 3. In view of the memo, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RAK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1