ADVOCATE GIRISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. PRESIDING OFFICER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL RAIBARELI AND 9 OTHERS
A227/3845/2025 · 2025-07-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146496 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146496 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37642
Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3845 of 2025 Petitioner :- Advocate Girish Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- Presiding Officer Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Raibareli And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Present petition has been filed for the following relief:
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to aside the order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the opposite parties no 1 in motor accident claim petition no. 270/2010, Vindheshwari Devi Srivastava & Others Versus Ram Chandra Maurya & others, by allowing the application dated 19.11.2024 against application dated 21.08.2024 and dismissed the application dated 21.08.2024 or Issue such other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the Petitioner/Respondent by allowing the petition with cost."
2. The main grievance of the petitioner was that the client has engaged another advocate without NOC, as such, the other advocate be restrained from appearing on behalf of the client.
3. Considering the fact that it is the right of the client to engage an advocate on his behalf, no good ground for interference is made out.
4. Present petition is dismissed in above terms. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench