2025:HHC:17519 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 41 of 2025 Date of decision 3.6.2025. Baljeet Singh & another ...Petitioners. Versus Chandu Lal ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ashok Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Banta, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (oral): CMP No. 12723 /2025 Be registered. Civil Revision No. 41/2025 The petitioner-tenant Sh. Baljeet Singh and special attorney of respondent-landlord Sh. Sanjeev Sood are present in person along with their respective counsel. 2. An application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure has jointly been presented by the parties in the Court today, wherein the terms of settlement arrived at between the parties have 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- been recorded. A prayer has been made in the application to dispose of Civil Revision No. 41 of 2025 in terms of the settlement recorded in the application. 3. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of petitioner-tenant and special attorney of respondent-landlord. A copy of special power of attorney executed in favour of Sh. Sanjeev Sood has also been placed on record along with the application. 4. I have gone through the contents of the application and have found that the terms settled between the parties are in accordance with law. I am satisfied that the parties have entered into a settlement voluntarily. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The undertaking furnished by the petitioner-tenant Sh. Baljeet Singh is accepted. He has been made aware about the consequence of breach of undertaking. 5. Accordingly, Civil Revision No. 41 of 2025 is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties and such terms shall form part of the eviction order. The order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controller-I, Shimla and also affirmed by the learned -3- Appellate Authority-II Shimla vide impugned judgment dated 30.4.2025 in Rent Appeal No. 16-S/13(b) of 2022 is upheld. The eviction order, however, shall remain in abeyance till 30.11.2026 in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, subject to the condition that the petitioner-tenant does not make any default in compliance of terms and conditions, as recorded in the application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. 6. The respondent-landlord will furnish the bank details to the petitioner-tenant within one week and on such furnishing, the petitioner-tenant shall remit the amount in the said bank account as per terms of settlement by the parties. 7. The respondent-landlord shall be at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner-tenant before the learned Rent Controller towards arrear of rent. 8. The Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 3rd June, 2025 Judge (kck)