Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14647 (AP)

Margani Nageswararao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/3926/2025 · 2025-04-29

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.3926 of 2025 Order: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner herein/Accused, seeking anticipatory bail, in connection with Crime No.13 of 2025 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Rajamahendravaram South, East Godavari district. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein for the offence punishable under Section 7-B read with 8(A) and (B) of the A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2020. 3. Case of the prosecution is that on 05.01.2024, at about 08.30 PM, on credible information, the Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector, ESTF, Rajamahendravaram, along with his staff, reached the Puntha road in front of Current Office, which leads to Srikrishnapatnam to Patha Thungapadu in Sri Krishnapatnam village of Rajanagaram Mandal and found oner person stirring with a stick in a plastic drum and on seeing the police party he ran away from the spot. The police party found 1000 litres of FJ wash in 5 plastic frums, which was fit for distillation of ID liquor and also found 35 litres of ID liquor in a black plastic Can. After lifting samples, remaining FJ wash was destroyed and ID liquor 2 was seized under cover of a special report and a case has been registered against the accused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he is falsely implicated in the present crime based on the police proceedings and nothing has been seized from his possession. He further submits that most of the investigation is completed. 5. On the contrary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is in progress and if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, he may hamper the process of investigation and tamper with the prosecution evidence. 6. Heard. Perused the record. 7. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that basing on the police proceedings the name of the petitioner herein was shown as accused in the present crime and nothing has been seized from the possession of the petitioner herein/Accused. Major portion of investigation is completed. 8. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/Accused on the following conditions. i) In the event of arrest of the petitioner herein/Accused in the aforesaid crime, he shall be enlarged on bail on his 3 executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Arresting Officer. ii) Petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required, and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. iii) Petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e., on every Saturday between 10.00 AM and 01.00 PM till filing of charge sheet. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J Dated:29.04.2025 Nsr 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.3926 of 2025 Dated:29.04.2025 Nsr