Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14645 (JHR)

DEEPAK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4291/2025 · 2025-08-11

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2025: JHHC:23018) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4291 of 2025 1. Deepak Kumar, aged about 30 years, son of Sri Shyam Babu Ray, 2. Ranjit Yadav, aged about 40 years, son of Sri Sarvan Yadav, 3. Vishal Kumar Yadav, aged about 26 years, son of Subodh Ray, 4. Poonam Devi, aged about 20 years, wife of Ram Kumar Singh, All resident of Namkum Khatal, near Namkum Railway Station, P.O and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi --- --- Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the O.P-State: Ms. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. For the Informant: Ms. Neha Pandey, Advocate --- 03 / 11.08.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) & (3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 103 (1) of the B.N.S. has been added, pending in the Court of Sri Mayank Maliyaz, learned Judicial Magistrate-IX, Ranchi. 3. On 15.03.2025 at about 3:00 P.M., about 13 named persons and 150 unknown persons attacked the house of the informant and assaulted those present there. It appears that ten persons including the husband of the informant sustained injuries. Later on, husband of the informant succumbed to his injuries. 4. It was submitted that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. It was further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. It was further submitted that co-accused Ritesh Kumar whose case stands on similar footing has been granted bail by this court vide B.A. No. 6242 of 2025. 5. Ms. Neha Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Informant, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail 6. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty 2. thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Mayank Maliyaz, learned Judicial Magistrate-IX, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded