Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146442 (ALL)

SMT. UREHA DEVI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ORS.

SCCR/9/2016 · 2025-07-17

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 7 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 9 of 2016 Revisionist :- Smt. Ureha Devi Opposite Party :- Additional District Judge Ambedkar Nagar And Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Anurag Tripathi,Gyanendra Nath,Shyam Sundar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Atul Kr.Yadav,Jai Praksh Yadav Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Order on I.A. No.8 of 2023 1. The present application seeks condonation of delay in filing recall application. 2. The cause shown is sufficient. The application is allowed. 3. The delay in filing the recall application is condoned. Order on I.A. No.9 of 2023 4. The present application seeks recall of the order dated 29.11.2022. 5. The cause shown is sufficient. The application is allowed. 6. The order dated 29.11.2022 is recalled. The revision is restored to its original file and number. Order on main petition 7. The instant revision was filed challenging a judgment and decree dated 28.11.2015 passed in Small Suit No.1 of 2010. 8. Considering the fact that the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 has now been repealed, the present revision is disposed off with the observations that the revisionist would be at liberty to file an application under the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021 seeking eviction. 9. In case, such an application is filed under the Tenancy Act, 2021, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of six months from the date of filing of fresh application along with certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench